At a Glance
Discipline
- Biology
Instructional Level
- College & CEGEP
- University
Course
- General Biology
Tasks in Workflow
Social Plane(s)
- Individual
- Group
- Whole Class
Type of Tasks
- Collecting & seeking information
- Discussing
- Reviewing & assessing peers
- Writing
- Taking a quiz & test
Technical Details
Useful Technologies
- Online learning platform with Wiki LTI
Time
Semester long
Overview
In this peer assessment-based activity, students work on a semester-long project researching a topic of interest in which they demonstrate how a quantifiable X variable (e.g., calcium) affects a quantifiable Y variable (e.g., hip fracture rates in women). The activity is performed in Moodle with wiki pages, though any other learning platform can be used.
Breakdown of project
Start of semester:
Students get into groups of 4-8 (depending on the size of the class) and come up with a group name.
Students choose a topic they are interested in that meets the criteria outlined ...
In this peer assessment-based activity, students work on a semester-long project researching a topic of interest in which they demonstrate how a quantifiable X variable (e.g., calcium) affects a quantifiable Y variable (e.g., hip fracture rates in women). The activity is performed in Moodle with wiki pages, though any other learning platform can be used.
Breakdown of project
Start of semester:
Students get into groups of 4-8 (depending on the size of the class) and come up with a group name.
Students choose a topic they are interested in that meets the criteria outlined in the Group Project Description (full activity package).
Students come up with an outline for their project, and the instructor reviews the quality of the outline and provides feedback.
Middle of semester:
Students work in their groups on the project.
Groups are put into supergroups (~6 groups per supergroup). These supergroups separate teams for evaluation (feedback and evaluation)
1st draft: groups provide feedback on Moodle for the other teams in their supergroup. TAs also provide feedback.
2nd draft: repeat feedback steps performed for first draft.
End of semester:
Groups hand in their project and evaluate (grade-based) their peers' projects in their supergroup. Students also evaluate the contribution of their other group members. The instructor and TA evaluate individual student contribution to the project.
Instructional Objectives
- Students learn to critically assess research presented in peer-reviewed, primary research articles.
- Students learn how to cite and read peer-reviewed articles, and gain a basic understanding of what comprises a good research article (statistics, controls, methods, key questions addressed in the paper, etc.).
- Students work both as a team and individually during this activity, enabling them to develop autonomous critical thinking skills, as well as collaborative skills.
- Students learn to give constructive criticism and how to evaluate their peers.
Workflow & Materials
Contributor's Notes
Madoka Gray-Mistume
Concordia University, Montreal, QC
Benefits
Student engagement and material retention have improved since using this activity. Students are more engaged during class, and their understanding of the course material is better overall.
Challenges
Group dynamics can be difficult to predict; some groups might not work well.
Tips
Continual feedback throughout the semester helps keep groups on track and also to make sure that everyone in the group is pulling their weight, which can prevent or solve negative group dynamics.
Giving students some time during lecture periods to meet up with their groups for in-person discussion helps prevent bad group dynamics too.
Applied Strategies
Published: 18/09/2018
Copyright: © 2019 Gray-Mistume. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication on this website is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.