At a Glance

Discipline

  • Humanities

Instructional Level

  • College & CEGEP

Course

  • 345-101-MQ Knowledge

Tasks in Workflow

Social Plane(s)

  • Group

Type of Tasks

  • Discussing
  • Solving problems

Technical Details

Useful Technologies

  • High tech version: Smart boards
  • Low tech version: Paper, scissors, adhesive

Class size

  • Small (20-49)

Time

Single class period (< 90 mins)

Instructional Purpose

  • Application & knowledge building

Socio Affective Engagement

  • Array
  • Array

Overview

The aim of this single-class activity is to help students consolidate their knowledge and review concepts seen in class. Students have the opportunity to apply the concepts learned in the course and relate the specific examples and material to larger concepts. This activity, which employs the Active learning strategies of Concept Mapping and Toolkit, helps them organize their understanding of the topics in preparation for the exam.

This is done as a review activity after the students have covered the related topics. They learn about the ideas of rationalism and empiricism, and then some specific terms and philosophers related to ...

Read More +

The aim of this single-class activity is to help students consolidate their knowledge and review concepts seen in class. Students have the opportunity to apply the concepts learned in the course and relate the specific examples and material to larger concepts. This activity, which employs the Active learning strategies of Concept Mapping and Toolkit, helps them organize their understanding of the topics in preparation for the exam.

This is done as a review activity after the students have covered the related topics. They learn about the ideas of rationalism and empiricism, and then some specific terms and philosophers related to each of these approaches. Then students review and consolidate their knowledge on these topics by doing this review activity. Finally, this leads into another activity where students work on an outline for their exam response on this topic.

Working in groups, students have to categorize statements/names/terms under the heading of empiricist or rationalist. They can compare their responses with that of other groups. The teacher will check on their work and they will need to make adjustments as needed. At the end, students should take a photo of their completed work for their notes.

Read Less -

Instructional Objectives

  • Understand the differences and links between categories
  • Understand key parts of the topics and see how they relate/fit with each other.

Workflow & Materials

Contributor's Notes

Jen Mitchell
Jen Mitchell

Vanier College, Montreal, QC

Benefits

  • ¬†Helps students understand the different topics we’ve looked at and how they fit together with the larger concepts
  • Helps clarify misconceptions about any of the terms or concepts

Challenges

  • Some groups are less inclined to figure it out themselves and wait to copy other groups. However, checking in with them often helps to resolve this problem since they can’t depend on just copying the other groups. This allows me to address them more directly

Tips

  • Don’t intercede until the groups feel they have finished. Then do not tell them what is wrong, if any. Just tell them how many they have wrong in each category and have them continue to work on figuring it out
  • At the end, review the responses with the class and focus on the terms or concepts that are most difficult
  • It is good to follow up this activity with a worksheet and workshop activity to help students prepare for the exam

Feedback

Leave a comment! Activities get better when we receive feedback and understand how they might be adapted and reused. Please let us know what you think after using this Activity, or if you have questions about how it might be used differently.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *